On 18/03/16 16:49, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:35 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: >> Fix order of mac80211_rx_flags description to match the enum. >> >> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Hi, >> >> I want ahead and fixed the order of the descriptions. checkpatch.pl >> was giving >> a warning to my previous patch and I had a hunch it was because the >> wrong order >> breaks the parser. Indeed it does and with this patch below >> checkpatch.pl does >> not complain about this flag descriptions anymore. >> > Huh. I think we should fix checkpatch.pl instead. While the current > order isn't likely really good, I believe kernel-doc will output the > documentation in the order it's listed, and that can be useful for the > documentation output to group related things, even if their bits may be > further apart. > > johannes > I agree checkpatch.pl should be fixed. I can look into it. No promises though, it has been a long time since I look at Perl code. I understand the logic of grouping the documentation in logical blocks. It is unfortunate though that this means the enum and documentation won't match, which makes reading the code harder. In this particular case I don't see the order of the documentation broken because flags are being grouped. Thanks for the review :) Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
