On 18/03/16 17:29, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:35 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: >> Fix order of mac80211_rx_flags description to match the enum. >> >> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Hi, >> >> I want ahead and fixed the order of the descriptions. checkpatch.pl was giving >> a warning to my previous patch and I had a hunch it was because the wrong order >> breaks the parser. Indeed it does and with this patch below checkpatch.pl does >> not complain about this flag descriptions anymore. > > checkpatch complains? About what? > warning: Enum value 'RX_FLAG_DUP_VALIDATED' not described in enum 'mac80211_rx_flags' Is the warning checkpatch.pl gives against my first patch (add doc for RX_FLAG_DUP_VALIDATED flag). This is silenced by reordering the descriptions to match the order in the enum. Thanks, Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
