On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 15:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:01 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote: > > This patch is based on a patch from Shailendra Govardhan. It introduces > > several new iwprivs: {get,set}_bootflag {get,set}_boottime {get,set}_def_chan > > {get,set}_def_protid {get,set}_def_metid {get,set}_def_meshcap > > {get,set}_def_meshid. These commands are only supported on Marvell hardware > > that implements persistent defaults, such as the OLPC Active Antenna. > > Accordingly, this patch may not be suitable for upstream merging. > But this is the _one_ thing which might actually be OK to do with a > private ioctl, since it's very hardware-specific. Unlike like all the > mesh-mangling stuff where we really ought to be compatible with o11s. > > So maybe, just maybe, we _can_ do this with iwpriv and push that > upstream. Maybe we do, after all, need an iwpriv equivalent in cfg80211/nl80211 so that we can kill wext at some point. Or maybe this should be in sysfs or so? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part