On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:01:48PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Dave, please allow me to ask a heretical question. Returning TX_BUSY has some > appeal for virtio_net: is it fundamentally a flawed idea, or simply a matter > of coding? I don't think returning TX_BUSY is fundamentally flawed (unlike LLTX which is). However, until somebody (i.e., you :) writes the code to handle it properly, i.e., not making the requeued packet go through AF_PCAKET twice, it's something that shouldn't be encouraged. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
