This: > -#if !defined(CONFIG_LIBNL20) && !defined(CONFIG_LIBNL30) > +#if !defined(CONFIG_LIBNL20) && !defined(CONFIG_LIBNL30) && !defined(CONFIG_LIBNL_TINY) > -#endif /* CONFIG_LIBNL20 && CONFIG_LIBNL30 */ > +#endif /* CONFIG_LIBNL20 && CONFIG_LIBNL30 && CONFIG_LIBNL_TINY */ can be handled by just defining CONFIG_LIBNL20 for libnl-tiny. > -/* libnl 1.x compatibility code */ > +/* libnl 1.x and libnl-tiny compatibility code */ > #if !defined(CONFIG_LIBNL20) && !defined(CONFIG_LIBNL30) > # define nl_sock nl_handle > #endif Are you sure this is needed? Elsewhere you said libnl-tiny uses libnl20 compatible API, which is with nl_handle. If this is needed perhaps some code erroneously uses nl_sock instead of nl_handle? Perhaps we should also consider treating 2.0/3.x as the default API and use nl_handle instead of nl_sock in the code. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
