On 2016-03-03 16:07, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 16:03 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> >> > This isn't *quite* right, since you have to take an 802.11 header >> > (vs. >> > an ethernet header) into account, I think? >> It's only a rough approximation anyway to prevent very large A-MSDUs >> from being created with low rates. >> > > Right, but it seemed like the intent was to allow two full-MTU sized > frames to be combined, which this doesn't. I'll look into it some more to see if it's better to change the comment or the code in this case. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
