On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 22:00 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:35 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 21:22 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 May 2008 20:56:36 Harvey Harrison wrote: > > > > It is always called with the same dev, register value as the > > > > b43_phy_write that wraps around it, make it return void > > > > and move the register write into radio2050_rfover_val. > > > > > > NACK to the whole 5 patches. > > > See the list archives for an explanation. > > > > Any particular reference for nacking 5/5? > > > > While I respectfully disagree with you Re: 1-4 I can't make you take it. > > You could prove that those are correct: > > make the function you're going to use an inline, compile & > objdump/md5sum, apply the patch conversion, compile & objdump/md5sum & > compare, make function out of line again At this point I'll let sleeping dogs lie, it's not worth fighting over. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
