On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:39 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:17:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > > > Based upon them I will adjust LL_MAX_HEADER as follows: > > > > > @@ -93,14 +93,16 @@ struct wireless_dev; > > > * used. > > > */ > > > > > > -#if !defined(CONFIG_AX25) && !defined(CONFIG_AX25_MODULE) && !defined(CONFIG_TR) > > > -#define LL_MAX_HEADER 32 > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_WLAN_80211) || defined(CONFIG_AX25) || defined(CONFIG_AX25_MODULE) > > > > Is WLAN_80211 really the right symbol here? It applies to more than > > just mac80211, and I doubt if full MAC devices need higher values. > > It seems like MAC80211 would be the right symbol to add. > > Most fullmac devices also need some space, whether they do things that > way or not is a completely different thing, the ieee80211 stack for > example copies every packet into a new skb anyway. It's really depends on when is the 802.3 to 802.11 header translation made it doesn't matter whether it's fullmac or softmac. I would say that WLAN is OK. Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
