On 2016-02-08 11:26, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Krishna Chaitanya > <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Requires software tx queueing support. frag_list support (for zero-copy) >>>> is optional. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>> >>> >>> Ok - looks fine, but... and here comes the hard stuff. >>> The frame size in the PLCP is limited in a way that you can't - from a >>> spec POV - enable A-MSDU for low rates. Of course, you don't want to >>> do that for low rates at all regardless of the spec. >>> Since you build the A-MSDU in the mac80211 Tx queue which is not aware >>> of the link quality, how do we prevent A-MSDU if the rate is low / >>> dropping. >>> I'd even argue that when the rates get lower, you'll have more >>> packets piling up in the software queue and ... even more chance to >>> get A-MSDU in the exact case where you really want to avoid it? >> >> Similar to triggering AMPDU setup, we should put this control >> in RC (minstrel) to start/stop AMSDU based on link quality/if the rates >> drop below a pre-defined MCS (or) only for best-throughput rates. > > Ok - but the size of A-MPDU is determined in the firmware / hardware > typically (at least for Intel devices and I have to admit my ignorance > about other designs...). So that if you get bad link conditions, the > firmware can play for that size. A-MSDU built in the host is a > different story. I remember that athXk devices attach the rate on the > Tx packet itself so that the rate control is serialized with the data > path. > iwlwifi works differently: we have a map of rates in the firmware. > This map is maintained in the driver updated based on the feedback we > get from the device. When an update is needed, iwlwifi sends a command > to the firmware and that command bypasses all the Tx packets currently > queue so that a packet that is already waiting in the queue will be > sent with the updated map. This allows iwlwifi to react downgrade > faster when needed. Even ath9k has been converted to use a per-sta rate table with optional per-packet rate overrides for probing. > So - for athXk (and maybe the MediaTek devices Felix is working on), > this may not be a big problem: you'd need to add another input to the > A-MSDU building code coming from the rate control. > FWIW: in iwlwifi I simply decided to be on the safe side and allowed > the driver to build A-MSDUs only if the rate is fairly high and we are > not downgrading. But you saw (and commented on) that patch already I > think :) I think it would be a good idea for iwlwifi to start using the rate control API properly. Not only would that simplify integration with the A-MSDU code, it would also make it possible to compare minstrel_ht with the iwlwifi rate control code. The iwlwifi rate control code is doing some crazy things, and I'd be really interested in seeing how it compares to the more simple and structured approach taken in minstrel_ht. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
