On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 11:41 +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > > > > I would think that, indeed, it *is* its job since its job is > > key/algorithm selection and 11n limits the choices. > > > > depends on priorities, maybe the security selection should limit the > 11n... IMHO, security should be in higher priority since the user > explicitly said he wants TKIP > > > How about we simply put the 11n information element into the generic IE > > and have mac80211 use that? > > > > in mac80211 we perfectly know what the AP supports (in > ieee80211_send_assoc, I can read the IEs from the AP) , that's no the > issue here, the issue is what security alg the user will chose in the > 4way. This decision affects the associate even though it occurs after > the association Ah, so you mean if the user chose TKIP then we should associate as a legacy STA? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
