On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:08:58AM +0100, Henning Rogge wrote:
> @@ -951,37 +974,14 @@ enddel:
> */
> static int mpp_path_del(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, const u8 *addr)
> {
> - struct mesh_table *tbl;
> - struct mesh_path *mpath;
> - struct mpath_node *node;
> - struct hlist_head *bucket;
> - int hash_idx;
> - int err = 0;
> -
> - /* flush relevant mpp entries first */
> - mpp_flush_by_proxy(sdata, addr);
> -
Is it intentional that mpp_path_del no longer calls mpp_flush_by_proxy()
while mesh_path_del does?
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
