On Wednesday 27 January 2016 19:26:13 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > So, why give the compiler a hard time as you're doing, why make the code > harder to read. What's wrong with: > > spin_lock_bh(&local->baplock); > > res = hfa384x_setup_bap(dev, BAP0, rid, 0); > if (res) > goto unlock; > > res = hfa384x_from_bap(dev, BAP0, &rec, sizeof(rec)); > if (res) > goto unlock; > > if (le16_to_cpu(rec.len) == 0) { > /* RID not available */ > res = -ENODATA; > goto unlock; > } > > rlen = (le16_to_cpu(rec.len) - 1) * 2; > if (exact_len && rlen != len) { > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: hfa384x_get_rid - RID len mismatch: rid=0x%04x, len=%d (expected %d)\n", > dev->name, rid, rlen, len); > res = -ENODATA; > goto unlock; > } > > res = hfa384x_from_bap(dev, BAP0, buf, len); > unlock: > spin_unlock_bh(&local->baplock); > > ? > Good idea, I'll send a new version. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html