Hi Johannes, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 10:27 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: >> I'd prefer to just set ->removed to false right after we set >> ->auto_seq as that should be faster, however I don't know if >> __ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session() is a fast path so I don't know if >> this is saving anything. > > It's not supposed to be called frequently, no. Then most of my commentary is moot. I guess the argument comes down to do we zero everything or initialise everything, and if speed isn't an issue, the former is better. >> On another note, this is an error that should be pretty easy to spot. >> Could any of the automated tools find cases where a struct containing >> a bool variable is kmalloc'd and returned without assigning all the >> bools? > > I think you'd quickly drown in false positives, since "return" isn't > necessarily something that means it needs to have been fully > initialized. True. Either way, I'm guessing that UBSAN will pick up a lot of similar bugs and the output of that is probably a much smaller haystack to dig through than just "every" kmalloc() call. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
