> Every time you send a set of patches, I suggested some updates for Linux source files since October 2014. > there are legitimate issues which people raise, There was usual feedback. > and every time they are discussed, The discussion results were mixed between acceptance and usual disagreement. > you assert that your patches improve things I guess that should be the default intention of every patch, shouldn't it? > and seem to ignore the concerns people raise. I hope not. - But I can imagine that you might understand some responses from contributors in this way. Are you waiting for another clarification on a specific issue? > I've seen this same pattern of discussion here with these patches, > with your patches to move labels into if statements, with the patches > you sent late June last year, your patches to remove conditions before > kfree() and friends, etc. It seems that communication difficulties come partly from the fact that I chose search patterns from static source code analysis so far which belong to an error category that gets a lower priority. > You need to change you attitude: just because you can see some benefit > from your patches doesn't mean others do and it doesn't mean that > they're willing to accept them. I understand your advice. Further update suggestions with higher importance might follow for various software areas in the future. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
