On 2015년 12월 24일 11:39, Julian Calaby wrote:
Hi Glen,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Glen Lee <glen.lee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
wilc_sdio_init return always 1. It is needless, so just remove it and it's
related codes also.
Signed-off-by: Glen Lee <glen.lee@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c
index e961b50..caad876 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c
@@ -185,11 +185,6 @@ static void wilc_sdio_disable_interrupt(struct wilc *dev)
dev_info(&func->dev, "wilc_sdio_disable_interrupt OUT\n");
}
-static int wilc_sdio_init(void)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-
/********************************************
*
* Function 0
@@ -611,13 +606,6 @@ static int sdio_init(struct wilc *wilc)
g_sdio.irq_gpio = (wilc->dev_irq_num);
- if (!wilc_sdio_init()) {
- dev_err(&func->dev, "Failed io init bus...\n");
- return 0;
- } else {
- return 0;
- }
-
This isn't equivalent code as both arms of the if statement eventually
call return 0.
Hi julian,
Yes, you are correct.
Actually, The original code was like this before It is patched wrongly.
- if (!wilc_sdio_init()) {
- dev_err(&func->dev, "Failed io init bus...\n");
- return 0;
- }
I could fix this first and then remove wilc_sdio_init().
But I thought that this can be fixed by removing wilc_sdio_init which also fixes always return 0 error.
Do you think I should fix "always return 0 error" first and then remove wilc_sdio_init()?
Or update change log about the error which cause this?
regards,
glen lee.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
