On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 17:34 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Thursday 08 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > > Right :) I'm pretty much done with the skb->cb conversion too except for > > > > ath5k (nick) and rt2x00 (you) > > > > > > I'm going to rebase rt2x00.git this weekend to update from wireless-testing, > > > since the skb->cb patches now depends on HW crypto which is not ready > > > for upstream yet, I am going to reverse the patch order so the skb->cb patches > > > and some other updates can go upstream more easily. > > > > Cool, thanks. If you have a single patch that can pretty much go into > > wireless-testing you can send it to me and I'll roll it into my patch. > > Well at the moment I have it split into 2 patches, one that is only > preperation work by splitting a particular function to guarentee the skb->cb > rules are being followed. And the second patch is the actual conversion. > Those 2 can easily be merged into a single patch which you can roll into your > patch. Whatever you like better. Maybe it's easier to follow the code/patch flow if your preparation patch goes in first on its own? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
