On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 22:59 +0800, Zeng Zhaoxiu wrote:
> If the result of adding the first set bit to the mask is power of 2,
> the mask must be contiguous. "mask & -mask" can get the first set bit
> of mask gracefully.
> - if (__ffs64(mask) + hweight64(mask) != fls64(mask))
> {
> + inc = (mask & -mask);
> + val = mask + inc;
> + if ((val & (val - 1)) != 0) {
> /* not a contiguous mask ... not handled now! */
Hm. Ok, I can see how that would work, but it doesn't really seem like
much of an "improvement" to me? Surely I seem to need much more
thinking to understand this. There's no reason to optimise it either,
so why should we change it?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
