Hi Brian,
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 09:30:11 -0800
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:14:10PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > bcm47xxnflash_remove() is supposed to unregister the NAND device previously
> > registered in bcm47xxnflash_probe(), but the current implementation just
> > test for the always NULL ->mtd platform data field (and does not call the
> > right function to unregister it).
> >
> > Kill the useless ->mtd field in struct bcma_nflash, and release the real
> > NAND device in bcm47xxnflash_remove().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: a5401370c520 ("mtd: prepare place for BCMA NAND flash driver(s)")
> > Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/bcm47xxnflash/main.c | 7 ++++---
> > include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h | 4 ----
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Hmm, looks awfully similar...
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554164/
My bad, I completely overlooked it, even though I was in Cc of this
patch.
I acked it, could you apply it before my series so that I can can
adjust the bcma patch?
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
