In case the hash grow failed, it is not fair to return error -
the new node _was_ _actually_ added in this case.
Besides, after my previous patch, this grow is more likely
to fail on large hashes.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c b/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
index 1154398..947b13b 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ int mesh_path_add(u8 *dst, struct net_device *dev)
newtbl = mesh_table_grow(mesh_paths);
if (!newtbl) {
write_unlock(&pathtbl_resize_lock);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return 0;
}
rcu_assign_pointer(mesh_paths, newtbl);
write_unlock(&pathtbl_resize_lock);
--
1.5.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
