On Wednesday 07 May 2008 15:05:48 Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:52:13PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > Hmm. Why does busy exist then? Historical accident? I really really > > Yes it's historical baggage. These days the biggest users would > be LLTX drivers which should all be converted to non-LLTX and > drivers that don't keep track of queue status properly. So there's no way to actually fail in a TX handler? Drivers are doomed to drop the packet, if they cannot handle it due to ring overflow? -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
