On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 12:46 +0530, Rahul Jain wrote: > From: Amit Khatri <amit.khatri@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > txrate variable might be NULL and passing inside function > without NULL check. Applied. However, this comes with a big BUT. I seems to always be rewriting your static checker patches, or asking for clarification, rewording, etc. Please: review what I did to this commit, and in the future please submit patches that actually describe what's going on, what you're doing, and why you're doing it. IOW, analyse the code and don't just do the minimum necessary to shut up the static checker. Doing that is fairly much useless, especially in really obscure cases like this. I'm going to drop further patches like this one without warning. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
