On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 23:02 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 23:01 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Ok, code is still extremely ugly, but at least it uses softmac (and > > why not mac80211? softmac has been deleted Never mind, a peek inside tells me it does use mac80211. However, the code gives me the creeps so I won't look any further. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
