Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Hmmm, this way we will have a unified firmware parsing logic. Is this a task >> which can be taken up easily or any other hidden complexities are invloved >> ?. > > Decoupling the parsing logic should be rather easy. I don't think > there are any gotchas. I agree. >> I mean can we do the changes for current parsing logic and then rework the >> test mode patch ? what is your suggestion ? > > If you want to do the unified parsing logic approach you should first > decouple the logic (i.e. make it not fill `struct ath10k` directly) > and then rework the testmode patch on top of that. Actually I prefer the other way around, I can first apply the test mode patch and later someone can decouple the logic in a new patch. The code size benefits that from all pretty small so I don't think it's sensible to delay this patch. But decoupling the logic would be nice cleanup to do. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
