From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 01:24:48 +0200
>
> > > @@ -699,6 +699,12 @@ int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
> > > if (skb_shared(skb))
> > > BUG();
> > >
> > > + if (unlikely((nhead || ntail) && skb->sk)) {
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "SKB BUG: Illegal pskb expand (%d:%d) "
> > > + "with socket attached\n",
> > > + nhead, ntail);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
> >
> > Ok I think I'm starting to understand this a little better. However,
> > shouldn't this function update skb->truesize so if the skb is later
> > attached to a different socket again it has the right size?
>
> Judging from some of the callers, the caller should. Why?!
Relax :-)
We certainly could check that there is no socket attached here,
and make the truesize adjustment right at this spot.
It just never happened before in practice in a way that matters.
That's why we have the truesize assertion, to discover situations
like this and thus be able to fix it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
