On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 16:07 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 00:56:23 +0200 > > > This was a stupid mistake, if you do it correctly it actually works and > > so far has only triggered a single warning on my system: > > > > [ 217.507048] SKB BUG: Invalid truesize (4294964120) size=432, sizeof(sk_buff)=176 > > > > that was with my patch though to update skb->truesize during !skb->sk > > pskb_expand_head() calls. > > Thanks a lot for tracking this down Johannes. No, no, I haven't. The only thing that was a stupid mistake was my change to check the actual allocated skb size in the truesize bug rather than do the < len check... That works, when you do it as in that patch, but the mac80211 stuff still stands (along with all the questions I posted elsewhere in this thread) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
