Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Add support for OCB mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-09-09 14:55, Jan Kaisrlik wrote:
> The patch adds support for "outside the context of a BSS"(OCB) mode
> to ath9k driver and extends debugfs files by OCB ralated information.
> 
> This patch was tested on AR9380-AL1A cards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kaisrlik <kaisrja1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c          |  1 +
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h        |  1 +
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c        |  4 ++--
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c |  3 ++-
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c           |  1 +
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c         |  3 ++-
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c         | 11 +++++++++--
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c         |  2 +-
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/debug.c              |  2 ++
>  9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
> index 25e45e4..0ec2c0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ void ath9k_ani_reset(struct ath_hw *ah, bool is_scanning)
>  
>  	if (is_scanning ||
>  	    (ah->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION &&
> +	     ah->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_OCB &&
>  	     ah->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If we're scanning or in AP mode, the defaults (ini)
I don't think OCB should be treated like STA/Ad-Hoc for ANI purposes.
In fact, I think most places inside ath9k_hw should treat OCB the same
as AP - maybe even by leaving ah->opmode at NL80211_IFTYPE_AP for OCB.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> index 1dd0339..2144362 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> @@ -1234,6 +1234,7 @@ static void ath9k_hw_set_operating_mode(struct ath_hw *ah, int opmode)
>  
>  	ENABLE_REG_RMW_BUFFER(ah);
>  	switch (opmode) {
> +	case NL80211_IFTYPE_OCB:
>  	case NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC:
>  		if (!AR_SREV_9340_13(ah)) {
>  			set |= AR_STA_ID1_ADHOC;
Why treat OCB like Ad-hoc for STA_ID1?

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> index c27143b..f121ec0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c

> @@ -1122,7 +1127,8 @@ void ath9k_calculate_summary_state(struct ath_softc *sc,
>  	ath9k_hw_setopmode(ah);
>  
>  	ctx->switch_after_beacon = false;
> -	if ((iter_data.nstations + iter_data.nadhocs + iter_data.nmeshes) > 0)
> +	if ((iter_data.nstations + iter_data.nadhocs +
> +	     iter_data.nmeshes + iter_data.nocbs) > 0)
>  		ah->imask |= ATH9K_INT_TSFOOR;
>  	else {
>  		ah->imask &= ~ATH9K_INT_TSFOOR;
Enabling the TSFOOR interrupt for OCB seems completely wrong to me. If I
understand this mode correctly, there are no beacons, hence no TSF
synchronization.

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux