Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 08/31/2015 11:54 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> As I mentioned in a direct email - calling writeN from slow_writeN is >> not a solution. I found some devices fail if you try to use the fast >> writeN routine. Maybe rtl8xxxu_raw_write32() - without the byteswap >> would be a better approach, or simply putting the relevant code into the >> slow_writeN function. >> >> I am flying back to New York tomorrow, and I'll have some time on the >> plane, so I'll try to have a look at that. > > I also found that trying to write all N bytes at once failed, but > writing 64 at a time is OK. I will add the USB calls to slow_writeN. I see, it's possible we need to add it as a parameter to writeN or add the size to the fops struct for the different device types. In fact the latter might be a cleaner approach, especially if it works for 8192/8188 devices with 64 byte writes. Getting rid of slow_writeN altogether would be nice. Jes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
