is it never getting any readings before your patch? NF Readings all look empty... -adrian On 27 July 2015 at 15:30, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I wonder if this is a mis-merge on my part (I'm the freebsd maintainer.) >> >> can you log the noisefloor calibrated values before and after the >> patch? I'd like to see how low it calibrrates to. > Sure, I hope dump_nfcal provides all values you need. > > result with my patch applied (HT20): > # cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/dump_nfcal > Channel Noise Floor : -95 > Chain | privNF | # Readings | NF Readings > 0 -106 5 -110 -105 -109 -106 -106 > 1 -97 5 -97 -97 -97 -97 -97 > > Result before my patch (HT20): > # cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/dump_nfcal > Channel Noise Floor : -91 > Chain | privNF | # Readings | NF Readings > 0 -120 0 > 1 -120 0 > > Result before my patch (HT40): > # cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/dump_nfcal > Channel Noise Floor : -91 > Chain | privNF | # Readings | NF Readings > 0 -110 5 -110 -110 -110 -110 -110 > 1 -110 5 -110 -110 -110 -110 -110 > 3 -110 5 -110 -110 -110 -110 -110 > 4 -110 5 -110 -110 -110 -110 -110 > > > Let me know if this helps you or if you need more information. > > > Regards, > Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
