On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Vladimir Kondratiev <QCA_vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:06:37 PM Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: >> So your device is able to replicate and update the IP / TCP header? >> I don't really follow what your device is able to do. >> You seem to be cutting the frags so that their length sums up to mss. >> Which hints that your device can't segment the buffer by itself. OTOH, >> I don't see how you treat the IP / TCP header copy and modification. >> > Emmanuel: > Yes, it is correct - hardware know to replicate IP/TCP header; and > DMA written in such a way that I have to arrange fragments to > sums up to MSS. Ok - thanks for clarifying this. > > So this code fragment is OK. We tested it with lots of traffic. > However, after your comments for another code fragment, > I found there is a way to do it better. I'll rework and send updated patch. > I am working on something similar but our hardware does nothing for us. I hope to send my version next week as an RFC. > Kalle: please drop this patch. The rest of patches should apply cleanly > without this one. > > Thanks, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
