On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Johannes Berg<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>> > I found this conflict in information elements in curse of 11h implementation> >> > enum ieee80211_eid {> > WLAN_EID_MESH_CONFIG = 36, /* Pending IEEE 802.11 ANA approval */> > WLAN_EID_MESH_ID = 37, /* Pending IEEE 802.11 ANA approval */> >> > WLAN_EID_SUPPORTED_CHANNELS = 36,> > WLAN_EID_CHANNEL_SWITCH = 37,> > }> >> > I finding it very unlikely that this IDs will be assigned to MESH IEs> > as 11h is already approved.>> Heh. Interesting. I just looked at the ANA spreadsheet> (11-08-0227-00-0000-ana-database-assigned-numbers.xls) and there TGs> doesn't even have any tentative assignments although all other TGs do.> But TGh is still listed there rather than being subsumed into> 802.11-2007, what's up with that? Is there a new TGh?>It's in 7.3.2 table 20 in 11h draft I have here and in table 26 in11ma (unified version)These numbers are being used for few years already. This is what forexample Cisco APs are usingso I have strong feeling it won't change.
Not sure why you are looking for it in 11n spec
I suggest we renumber MESH stuff.
ThanksTomas��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
