In reg_process_hint, the test of "treatment == REG_REQ_IGNORE || treatment == REG_REQ_ALREADY_SET" is superfluous because the code in the if-then branch is identical to the code after the if statement. Coverity CID #1295939 Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/wireless/reg.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c index d359e0610198..fe6b0c6cca10 100644 --- a/net/wireless/reg.c +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c @@ -2080,9 +2080,6 @@ static void reg_process_hint(struct regulatory_request *reg_request) return; case NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_USER: treatment = reg_process_hint_user(reg_request); - if (treatment == REG_REQ_IGNORE || - treatment == REG_REQ_ALREADY_SET) - return; return; case NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_DRIVER: if (!wiphy) -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
