Search Linux Wireless

RE: AP + P2P_GO multichan tests with intel7260 as a P2P_CLIENT - direct probe issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >>
> >> I suspect this is because of P2P_GO NoA?
> >> Who should care about this direct probes tx when GO is not present?
> >>
> >> In case we didn't send direct probes - there is no problem and TC
> >> works correctly
> >>
> >
> > Interesting :)
> >
> > Any chance you can provide trace-cmd and sniffer capture?
> >
> > Normally, if we provided the FW with the BSSID information and TSF
> > information for syncing, once the FW hears the 1st beacon with the NoA
> > it should sync on it and not try to attempt to transmit any frames as
> > long as the AP is absent. It might also be related to the fact that
> > the probe requests are sent to broadcast address, but I need to
> > further checks this. Anyway, having some data would help ;)
> >
> Thats exactly the point, if GO is in NoA FW will not transmit but mac80211
> timed-out for direct probe.
> 
> So the question is should mac80211 even send the direct probe in this case
> when GO is in NoA?

I think that this should be the driver's/FW responsibility, as at this stage mac80211 already configured all the information needed for the driver to sync (assuming it heard a beacon/probe) and in addition mgd_prepare_tx() is called to have the driver/FW prepare for a transmission of the mgmt. frame, including synchronization with the P2P GO power state.

Regards,

Ilan.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux