On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:06:43AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > This shows you are doing something really wrong here, why not just fix > the function type to be a real pointer to a real structure? You are right, of course. > Or even better, just remove the parameter as I don't think they are > even used. I don't know how far you traced the code, you may be right. It eventually becomes driver_handler[] in wilc_wlan_cfg_commit() and we do this: drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c 1883 cfg->wid_header[1] = seq_no; /* sequence number */ 1884 cfg->wid_header[2] = (uint8_t)total_len; 1885 cfg->wid_header[3] = (uint8_t)(total_len >> 8); 1886 cfg->wid_header[4] = (uint8_t)driver_handler; 1887 cfg->wid_header[5] = (uint8_t)(driver_handler >> 8); 1888 cfg->wid_header[6] = (uint8_t)(driver_handler >> 16); 1889 cfg->wid_header[7] = (uint8_t)(driver_handler >> 24); We put it in the header. 1890 p->cfg_seq_no = seq_no; 1891 1892 /** 1893 * Add to TX queue 1894 **/ 1895 1896 /*Edited by Amr - BugID_4720*/ 1897 if (!wilc_wlan_txq_add_cfg_pkt(&cfg->wid_header[0], total_len)) And I don't know what we do with it after this. 1898 return -1; 1899 1900 return 0; 1901 } regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
