On 06/14/2015 10:36 PM, Michal Kazior wrote: > On 12 June 2015 at 17:37, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 06/11/2015 11:03 PM, Michal Kazior wrote: >>> On 12 June 2015 at 01:38, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 06/11/2015 02:07 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>>>> In my ath10k CT firmware, I am disabling the beacon-miss offloading >>>>> to save space and because it will not work with lots of virtual >>>>> stations. >>>>> >>>>> But, it must be that I need some way to tell the stack that this >>>>> feature is not enabled, because when suddenly kill my AP, then >>>>> the ath10k station connected to it shows endless 'beacon loss' events >>>>> in 'iw events' output, but it never actually loses connection. >>>>> >>>>> Stock firmware works fine, so probably I just need to disable >>>>> some feature flag when registering the ath10k hardware >>>>> when using CT firmware. >>>>> >>>>> With stock firmware, I see a quick dissassociation due to inactivity. >>>>> >>>>> I am having poor luck finding how a driver tells the stack >>>>> it has beacon miss offload or not, so, does anyone know how >>>>> this is controlled? >>>> >>>> I still am not sure why stock firmware works, but it appears >>>> the reason mine is failing is that the ACK status for mgt frames >>>> is always set to TRUE since the ath10k wmi-mgt-tx API is so >>>> lame. So, mac80211 does a probe, ath10k lies and says it was >>>> acked, and mac80211 then things all is well for another few >>>> seconds. >>> >>> mac80211 shouldn't do a Probe Req to an AP on beacon loss because >>> ath10k advertises it supports tx-status report. Hence mac80211 should >>> use NullFunc frames which shouldn't go through wmi-mgmt-tx but htt >>> tx-frm. >>> >>> But then again: NullFunc status reporting via htt tx-frm was broken on >>> 10.1 if memory serves right. I believe it was fixed in 10.2 or 10.2.4. >>> >>> This problem has been effectively obscured on stock 10.1 by the >>> offloaded beacon miss. >> >> Thanks for the hint. I was able to fix my firmware to properly >> return htt tx status, and now it appears to work properly. >> >> A quick throughput test works as well, so hopefully no regressions. >> >> I guess the NulFunc related comment is incorrect for 10.1 stock firmware? >> >> Maybe some others? >> >> static void ath10k_tx_htt(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) >> { >> struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data; >> int ret = 0; >> >> if (ar->htt.target_version_major >= 3) { >> /* Since HTT 3.0 there is no separate mgmt tx command */ >> ret = ath10k_htt_tx(&ar->htt, skb); >> goto exit; >> } >> >> if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control)) { >> if (test_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX, >> ar->fw_features)) { >> if (skb_queue_len(&ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_queue) >= >> ATH10K_MAX_NUM_MGMT_PENDING) { >> ath10k_warn(ar, "reached WMI management transmit queue limit\n"); >> ret = -EBUSY; >> goto exit; >> } >> >> skb_queue_tail(&ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_queue, skb); >> ieee80211_queue_work(ar->hw, &ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_work); >> } else { >> ret = ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx(&ar->htt, skb); >> } >> } else if (!test_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX, >> ar->fw_features) && >> ieee80211_is_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control)) { >> /* FW does not report tx status properly for NullFunc frames >> * unless they are sent through mgmt tx path. mac80211 sends >> * those frames when it detects link/beacon loss and depends >> * on the tx status to be correct. */ >> ret = ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx(&ar->htt, skb); >> } else { >> ret = ath10k_htt_tx(&ar->htt, skb); >> } > > The NullFunc workaround was originally done for 999.999.0.636 but > should be true for 10.1 as well with the sole exception the latter > doesn't have htt-mgmt-tx to workaround the problem. Is it correct to say that this logic is completely broken for stock 10.1 firmware because null-func frames are not management frames, so the packet goes out the ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx call, and stock 10.1 does not properly do tx status for htt-tx frames? And slightly different question: Once I put in proper htt ACK reporting into my firmware, I notice that stations often loose connectivity when they are idle. I captured a sniff, and it appears the null-func packets are sent, but the header is not requesting an explicit ACK, and the AP does not ACK it, so connection is lost. I guess that the null-func frames should be requesting explicit ACK? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html