Hello, On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:45:10PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:42 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:46 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > When assigning directly to the pointer contained in the driver data the > > > > local variable can be dropped together with the extra assignment to it. > > > > > > I'm not really sure I see the big benefit of this? It doesn't really > > > seem to make the code much easier to read/follow. > > > > > > I also don't really see the (perceived) objection with "dynamic memory" > > > though since that memory is freed pretty much immediately as soon as we > > > return a non-zero value from this function ... the function itself > > > allocates the memory, and clearly we return without it ever being able > > > to use it, so ... > > > > > > Anyway - I might apply this for the few removed lines of code, but only > > > with a better commit log. > > Alternatively squash it into patch 1/2 and add: > > > > While touching the code simplify it a bit to not need a local > > variable for the gpio descriptors. > > Too late, already applied & pushed out the other one. Ah, I thought you wanted a better commit log, didn't understand that you looked into that yourself. Best regards and thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
