Hi Kalle/Ben, Comments inlined. On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/08/2015 04:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> "Liu CF/TW" <cfliu.tw@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> - ath10k: add rawtxrx param for 10.2+ firmware to support sw, hw crypto >>> engine and raw Tx injection. >>> - mac80211: Add IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_RESERVE_TAILROOM support for TKIP and >>> CCMP required by ath10k and add per BSS(vif) based sw_crypto >>> control. >> >> This patch has few major problems. First of all, ath10k and mac80211 >> changes should be in separate patches. Secondly the patch is whitespace >> damaged, I recommend using git-send-email to avoid that. Thanks. Would split the patch into multiple changes. >> >> And there's just too much feature changes in one patch, it's usually >> better to split the features into separate patches. For example, you >> could first add a simple raw mode support to ath10k (ie. the bare >> minimum needed to get the feature) and then adding more advanced >> features per patch. >> >>> This change enables the raw Tx/Rx feature in ath10k 10.2+ firmware with a >>> module parameter 'rawtxrx'. With rawtxrx=1, the ath10k hardware crypto >>> engine could be optionally skipped to support use cases such as enabling >>> mac80211 sw crypto engine, user level crypto engine, raw Tx frame >>> injection. >> >> Lots of people, especially in Qualcomm, seem to call this feature as >> "raw mode". Would it be more descriptive to name the module paramer as >> 'rawmode'? Sounds good. Will use rawmode instead. >> >>> Testing: used QCA988x hw 2.0 with 10.2 firmware. >>> >>> ath10k ath10k nl80211 >>> rawtxrx nohwcrypt SW_CRYPTO >>> param param attribute Testing Status >>> ------- --------- --------- --------------------------------- >>> 0 0 - HW CCMP/TKIP tested ok. >>> 0 1 - Not supported by ath10k hw. >>> 1 0 - HW CCMP/TKIP tested ok. >>> 1 0 0 BSS 1 tested HW CCMP/TKIP ok. >>> 1 0 1 BSS 2 can bypass HW engine. >>> - mac80211 SW crypto tested ok. >>> - raw Tx frame injection tested ok. >>> 1 1 - HW crypto globally disabled. >>> - mac80211 SW crypto tested ok. >>> - raw Tx frame injection tested ok. >> >> I wonder does it make any sense to have nohwcrypt parameter? Especially >> if ath10k doesn't support case rawtxrx=0 and nohwcrypt=1. One >> possibility I came up is to have multiple values for rawtxrx, for >> example is rawtxrx=1 means HW crypt enabled and rawtxrx=2 HW crypt >> disabled. Ideas welcome. > > Indeed. I picked nohwcrypt because it seems to be the convention in previous Atheros drivers for this feature. In this case, I will drop nohwcrypt and do as you suggested. rawmode = 0: Raw mode disabled. Use the default native WiFi mode. In this mode, only HW crypto is supported. rawmode = 1: Use Raw rx decap + raw tx encap mode. Supports both SW and HW crypto. rawmode = 2: Same as 1, but with HW crypto engine globally disabled. When rawmode = 1, I want a further per BSS control to make some BSS use HW crypto and some BSS bypass HW crypto. For those BSS that have HW crypto bypassed, their data frames may come from either the normal wlan interfaces (therefore mac80211 sw crypto used), or from monitor interfaces (therefore Tx injected frames already encrypted + Rx frames still encrypted) > In my CT firmware, I end up using native tx and raw rx to enable rx-sw-crypt. > > (I could not figure out how to do raw-tx with encrypted frames, though since > 10.2 FW can do it, I guess it must be possible...) > > Maybe we could have a way to specify both rx and rx mode independently of > each other to support that use case as well? > > Maybe: > > > txmode=x; // 0 == native, 1 == raw (and maybe support other tx modes in the future as desired) > rxmode=x; // 0 == native, 1 == raw > nohwcrypt=x; // 0 == standard hw crypt, 0x1 == rx-sw-crypt, 0x2 == tx-sw-crypt, 0x3 == tx/rx-sw-crypt > > If any limits are placed, please do use feature flags instead of firmware version comparisons > ..that way I might can support at least some of this in CT firmware. > > Thanks, > Ben > I'd assume it's more desirable to have sw crypto supported using the same encapsulation mode for both rx/tx, right? Did you see use cases that only rx-sw-crypt or only tx-sw-crypt is needed? I prefer Kalle's suggestion to use only 1 flag instead of 3. FYI, in my case, I got Tx & Rx working in raw mode for both SW & HW crypto. - With FW 10.2, for (injected) encrypted Tx frames from monitor interface, there isn't much SW needs to do. Mianly set ATH10K_HW_TXRX_RAW + HTT_DATA_TX_DESC_FLAGS0_NO_ENCRYPT on the HTT Tx descriptor is sufficient. I found setting raw Tx encap mode on VDEV actually isn't really necessary. Per frame control anyway is finer grained control than per VDEV. Thanks, David > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
