On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:06:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 10:42 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:33 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:44:21PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > We're going to add firmware module signing support, but when we do > > > > this we end up with the following recursive dependency. Fix this by > > > > just depending on FW_LOADER, which is typically always enabled > > > > anyway. > > > > > > > > mcgrof@ergon ~/linux-next (git::master)$ make allnoconfig > > > > scripts/kconfig/conf --allnoconfig Kconfig > > > > crypto/Kconfig:15:error: recursive dependency detected! > > > > crypto/Kconfig:15: symbol CRYPTO is selected by SYSDATA_SIG > > > > init/Kconfig:1880: symbol SYSDATA_SIG is selected by FIRMWARE_SIG > > > > drivers/base/Kconfig:88: symbol FIRMWARE_SIG depends on FW_LOADER > > > > drivers/base/Kconfig:80: symbol FW_LOADER is selected by CRYPTO_DEV_QAT > > > > drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:1: symbol CRYPTO_DEV_QAT is selected by CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC > > > > drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:13: symbol CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC depends on CRYPTO > > > > > > This doesn't look like a real cycle to me so perhaps we can fix > > > kbuild to understand this? > > > > (Dependency circles involving selects still hurt my brain.) > > > > Perhaps Luis should have another look at 02/12. See that patch adds this > > Kconfig entry to init/Kconfig: > > config SYSDATA_SIG > > def_bool y > > select SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING > > select KEYS > > select CRYPTO > > select ASYMMETRIC_KEY_TYPE > > select ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE > > select PUBLIC_KEY_ALGO_RSA > > select ASN1 > > select OID_REGISTRY > > select X509_CERTIFICATE_PARSER > > > > As far as I can see this is not enclosed in anything that adds any > > dependencies. So that basically means that SYSDATA_SIG will always be > > set, for all architectures (because I think all arches source > > init/Kconfig). That should make it a pretty pointless symbol (except for > > the fact that it does trigger all those selects). > > > > The same patch also adds > > select SYSDATA_SIG > > > > to the entry for MODULE_SIG. But to me that looks like a nop, because > > SYSDATA_SIG will be set anyhow. So, but this is just I guess, the > > problem might go away if > > def_bool y > > > > is changed to just > > bool > > No, it doesn't. But the change I propose still makes sense, anyway. Thanks, yeah that should be fixed to def_bool n. I had tried def_bool n before my submission and that didn't fix it, for some reason I forgot to ammend that change. > > (Note that I haven't actually tested anything here, and it wouldn't be > > the first time my reasoning about Kconfig patches is completely off.) > > Hear, hear! > > > And, whatever the value of my analysis, adding a Kconfig problem in > > 02/12 just to fix it in 03/12 is a bit silly. I think the patches should > > be squashed if the problem can't be solved any other way. > > It seems the circular dependency warning is triggered by 5/12. > > And, having now fiddled a bit with this series, I think the approach > taken in this patch might actually be preferable treewide. > > See, FW_LOADER is 'y' unless EXPERT is set and one goes to the trouble > of setting FW_LOADER to 'n'. So in the 100+ places where FW_LOADER is > selected, that is done for, almost always, no immediate benefit. > Changing those places to use > depends on FW_LOADER > > should have no effect, I think. Except for the EXPERT people not wanting > FW_LOADER. But that would be putting the burden where it belongs, I'd > say. I think this is a correct assessment but only because FW_LOADER is exposed as optional via EXPERT mode. We can go on a cursade for that if folks are OK with that. > Am I missing something here? Yeah, I think this issue is deeper and *must* be fixed as otherwise we can't later do more complex intersection dependencies. What we do *for now* -- perhaps my patch is OK then given your assessemnt, but for our TODO item, we must keep track that we need to fix this. Let me explain. Based on a closer look at the qat Kconfig file I think the issue might be that for some reason kbuild is assuming that a symbol's select's and their own dependencies are in and of themselves related dependencies, that is incorrect. Although the request_firmware() call is done within the common code (CRYPTO_DEV_QAT), if just for testing purposes of my point we move "select FW_LOADER" to CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC the dependency issue becomes clearer: mcgrof@ergon ~/linux-next (git::your-recursive-qat-mom)$ make allnoconfig scripts/kconfig/conf --allnoconfig Kconfig crypto/Kconfig:15:error: recursive dependency detected! crypto/Kconfig:15: symbol CRYPTO is selected by SYSDATA_SIG init/Kconfig:1880: symbol SYSDATA_SIG is selected by FIRMWARE_SIG drivers/base/Kconfig:88: symbol FIRMWARE_SIG depends on FW_LOADER drivers/base/Kconfig:80: symbol FW_LOADER is selected by CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:12: symbol CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC depends on CRYPTO # # configuration written to .config # I'm saying that *if* the request_firmware() call was in CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC it would be wrong for kbuild to think that CRYPTO is somehow a dependency for FW_LOADER, although the above does not say that I think I thinks that as otherwise I cannot see why this would be considered a recursive dependency. This issue can be made clear by just removing as a test CRYPTO_DEV_QAT all together and having CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC select CRYPTO: config CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC tristate "Support for Intel(R) DH895xCC" depends on X86 && PCI default n select CRYPTO select FW_LOADER help Support for Intel(R) DH895xcc with Intel(R) QuickAssist Technology for accelerating crypto and compression workloads. To compile this as a module, choose M here: the module will be called qat_dh895xcc. mcgrof@ergon ~/linux-next (git::your-recursive-qat-mom)$ make allnoconfig scripts/kconfig/conf --allnoconfig Kconfig crypto/Kconfig:15:error: recursive dependency detected! crypto/Kconfig:15: symbol CRYPTO is selected by SYSDATA_SIG init/Kconfig:1880: symbol SYSDATA_SIG is selected by FIRMWARE_SIG drivers/base/Kconfig:88: symbol FIRMWARE_SIG depends on FW_LOADER drivers/base/Kconfig:80: symbol FW_LOADER is selected by CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:1: symbol CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC depends on CRYPTO # # configuration written to .config # So it should not mean that if CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC's selects something that that select depends on other of CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_DH895xCC's selects. For instance in this case it would would mean that we could not negate a feature that other drivers that selected FW_LOADER enabled. Here's a simple test Kconfig entry one can use to test this: Let's say rock climbers hate locker rooms, but swimmer need them. We can then have: config GYM tristate default n config LOCKER tristate default n depends on GYM config SWIMMING tristate default n select GYM select LOCKER config ROCK_CLIMBING tristate default n depends on !LOCKER select GYM Kbuild seems to believe that because swimmers need lockers that rock climbers need them too. That is obviously not true. mcgrof@ergon ~/linux-next (git::your-swimming-dad)$ make allnoconfig scripts/kconfig/conf --allnoconfig Kconfig drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:25:error: recursive dependency detected! drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:25: symbol GYM is selected by ROCK_CLIMBING drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:40: symbol ROCK_CLIMBING depends on LOCKER drivers/crypto/qat/Kconfig:29: symbol LOCKER depends on GYM # # configuration written to .config # So kbuild does not accept intersection of a feature as a possible outlet for a dependency, it wants things very atomic. In the FW_SIG case we do want to enable FW_LOADER but not have all drivers require CRYPTO. The issue is created because kbuild thinks FW_LOADER depends on CRYPTO given that a driver selects it. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html