On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 09:18 +0300, Ilan Peer wrote:
> Patch eeca9fce1d71a4955855ceb0c3b13c1eb9db27c1 (cfg80211: Schedule
> timeout for all CRDA call) introduced a regression, where in case
> that crda is not installed (or not configured properly etc.), the
> regulatory core will needlessly continue to call it.
And print a message, which was the complaint :)
> @@ -544,6 +549,11 @@ static int call_crda(const char *alpha2)
> /* query internal regulatory database (if it exists) */
> reg_regdb_query(alpha2);
>
> + if (reg_crda_timeouts > REG_MAX_CRDA_TIMEOUTS) {
> + pr_info("Exceeded CRDA call max attempts. Not calling CRDA\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
and won't this just trade one message for another??
Or in fact, duplicate messages - 'calling crda' followed by 'exceeded'?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
