> I figured as much from the original commit message. So rt2500pci works > properly when the use_short_preamble has the wrong value, and breaks > when it has the right one. > By the way, 2.6.25-rc8 was the first time that rt2500pci was ever fast > enough to be usable at all for me, so the bug you introduced seemed to > be the fix for my speed problems (which is odd). My guess is that > rt2500pci treats use_short_preamble wrong. Even using use_short_preamble wrongly shouldn't give much of a drop in network speed. I fear there's another bug. Is your AP even short-preamble capable? Maybe that's the problem, your AP isn't announcing short preamble but we're enabling it by that code? I haven't looked in too much detail yet though. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
