On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 09:14:14AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > It can change with every packet based on rate-control logic, right? You said you wanted to go from index to bitrate -- the index changes, but not the rate<->index mapping. > And, it seems unlikely to me that an extra 16 bytes or so would make a > great deal of difference. Using hash tables instead of linear walks > and other things would likely improve performance more? Last time I tested with perf, memcpy dominated everything -- I've been thinking about having a mode where just headers are sent to userspace to avoid some of that. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
