Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. > An appropriately named unsigned long is added and the assignments fixed up. > Rather than returning 0 (timeout) or a more or less random remaining time > (completion success) this return 0 or 1 which also resolves the type of the > functions being int. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx> Why does patch 2 in this patchset have RFC in the title but patches 1 and 3 not? That just makes me confused, I can't tell what you want me to do with the patches. Normally I just drop all patches (or patchsets) which have RFC, and that's what I'm going to do now. To save everyone's time, when submitting something please state clearly what's your intention. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
