Search Linux Wireless

RE: ARP dropped during WPA handshake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Below, a tcpdump capture from sta.
> > 17:43:12.964096 EAPOL key (3) v2, len 95
> > 17:43:12.998439 EAPOL key (3) v1, len 117
> > 17:43:13.062409 ARP, Request who-has 10.32.61.100 tell 10.32.0.1,
> > length 28
> > 17:43:13.079989 EAPOL key (3) v2, len 151
> > 17:43:13.082764 EAPOL key (3) v1, len 95
> > 17:43:14.062381 ARP, Request who-has 10.32.61.100 tell 10.32.0.1,
> > length 28
> > 17:43:14.127101 ARP, Reply 10.32.61.100 is-at b8:88:e3:45:1d:c6 (oui
> > Unknown), length 46
> > 17:43:14.127123 IP 10.69.1.201.41690 > 10.32.61.100.5001: UDP, length
> > 1470
> > 17:43:14.127136 IP 10.69.1.201.41690 > 10.32.61.100.5001: UDP, length
> > 1470
> >
> > You can see the ARP request during the WPA Handshake.
> 
> During the initial WPA handshake the connection is not fully set up, and so
> no general traffic can (nor should) pass between the STA and AP.
> That includes ARP and any L2/L3+ protocols, except for EAP and wifi
> management packets.
> 
> The interface itself must be IFF_UP before it can pass traffic, including the
> WPA handshake traffic.  IFF_UP only means that the interface can be
> configured at the L2 level and the hardware is active, it does *not* mean the
> interface can pass traffic.
> 
> Whatever is causing the ARPs shouldn't be doing that yet, and should be fixed
> to use the interface's "operstate" or IFF_LOWER_UP instead of IFF_UP.  Only
> when the supplicant changes the interface's operstate to IF_OPER_UP is the
> interface *actually* ready to pass traffic.  IFF_UP is not sufficient.
> 

Thanks for your reply. 

It seems wpa_supplicant set the operstate to IF_OPER_DORMANT when he received the ASSOCIATED Event from the driver (through netlink). And set the operstate to IF_OPER_UP in case of wpa handshake success.

Is it normal the local ip stack send arp when netdev it is on IF_OPER_DORMANT state?
	

> 
> 
> > 	Any suggestion will be appreciate.
> >
> > Cedric.
> > >
> > > > Thanks for your help.
> > > >
> > > > Cedric Voncken
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > > linux-wireless" in the body of a message to
> > > > majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
> > > > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux