On Wednesday 09 April 2008 20:12:05 Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Holger Schurig wrote: > > > > 9. Anyway to reuse existing usbnet infrastructure? > > > > > > Nope, the 2400 is a pure IP device (as Marcel mentioned). > > > > With "pure IP", do you mean IPv4? Or do you mean "pure > > IPv4/IPv6"? If it is "pure IPv4", then WiMAX seems not future > > proof ... > > It takes both. I guess what we should be saying is that it is > not an ethernet-frame based device :) What you give the device > is sent over to the base station, so it really is whatever the > base station operator implements, which is mostly IP protocol > (4, 6 or whatever). It's a pity that "Internet Protocol" (as in IPv4/IPv6) as well as "Intellectual Property" (as in IP-Core) have the same abbreviation. ;-) Regards, Chr. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
