On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:57 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100 > > > Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a > > way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and > > which don't. > > You can't apply "this" without the dependency patch #1. > > Therefore this should probably all go through my tree. Hey David. The eth_<foo>_addr functions already exist so 1/14 isn't a dependency. It's just a trivial improvement on existing code with CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and at least the arm 4.6.3 compiler. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
