On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jonas Gorski <jogo@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> RESEND: It seems patchwork didn't catch my patch. Trying again. >>> >>> Odd, I still don't see it in patchwork. I wonder what caused that? >> >> I also see it neither in my b43-dev nor linux-wireless archives, nor >> does google find it (only your reply). > > Ok, that explains why patchwork didn't catch it (it scans patches from > the linux-wireless mailing list). I already applied the patch to > wireless-drivers.git but I would appreciate if people would still review > it: > > commit 0ff66cffde47de51c155ebdd2356403276c04cc4 > Author: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon Mar 2 17:18:55 2015 +0100 > > b43: fix support for 5 GHz only BCM43228 model > > It was incorrectly detected as 2 GHz device. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 3.17+ > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c > index ccbdb05b28cd..75345c1e8c34 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c > @@ -5370,6 +5370,7 @@ static void b43_supported_bands(struct b43_wldev *dev, bool *have_2ghz_phy, > case 0x432a: /* BCM4321 */ > case 0x432d: /* BCM4322 */ > case 0x4352: /* BCM43222 */ > + case 0x435a: /* BCM43228 */ Broadcom agrees with that (taken from a broadcom sdk for bcm47xx): #define BCM43228_D11N_ID 0x4359 /* 43228 802.11n DualBand device */ #define BCM43228_D11N5G_ID 0x435a /* 43228 802.11n 5GHz device */ If that's enough for you, feel free to add a Reviewed-By from me. Jonas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
