Search Linux Wireless

8188e: possible recursive locking detected on linux-3.18.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!
I work with linux-3.18.7 on board with FreeScale iMX287 ARM CPU, for tests I use USB TP-Link TL-WN725N on RTL8188e chip.

[    7.802249] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ci_hdrc
[ 7.982221] Chip Version Info: CHIP_8188E_Normal_Chip_TSMC_D_CUT_1T1R_RomVer(0)

ifconfig wlan0 up
[   50.193673] MAC Address = e8:de:27:a3:ee:9d

iwlist wlan0 scan
[   56.633485]
[   56.635036] =============================================
[   56.640453] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   56.645876] 3.18.7+ #40 Not tainted
[   56.649379] ---------------------------------------------
[   56.654794] RTW_CMD_THREAD/84 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 56.660118] (&(&(pqueue->lock))->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<c0232fdc>] _rtw_alloc_network+0x14/0xc4
[   56.668948]
[   56.668948] but task is already holding lock:
[ 56.674801] (&(&(pqueue->lock))->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<c0235de8>] rtw_update_scanned_network+0x18/0x250
[   56.684378]
[   56.684378] other info that might help us debug this:
[   56.690924]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   56.690924]
[   56.696858]        CPU0
[   56.699313]        ----
[   56.701766]   lock(&(&(pqueue->lock))->rlock);
[   56.706244]   lock(&(&(pqueue->lock))->rlock);
[   56.710721]
[   56.710721]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   56.710721]
[   56.716662]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   56.716662]
[   56.723474] 2 locks held by RTW_CMD_THREAD/84:
[ 56.727927] #0: (&(&(pmlmepriv->lock))->rlock){+.....}, at: [<c023609c>] rtw_survey_event_callback+0x7c/0x1c4 [ 56.738115] #1: (&(&(pqueue->lock))->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<c0235de8>] rtw_update_scanned_network+0x18/0x250
[   56.748125]
[   56.748125] stack backtrace:
[   56.752516] CPU: 0 PID: 84 Comm: RTW_CMD_THREAD Not tainted 3.18.7+ #40
[ 56.759198] [<c000e010>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000c47c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 56.767002] [<c000c47c>] (show_stack) from [<c003cfa0>] (validate_chain+0xd14/0x1154) [ 56.774878] [<c003cfa0>] (validate_chain) from [<c003d940>] (__lock_acquire+0x560/0xbb0) [ 56.783011] [<c003d940>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c003dff4>] (lock_acquire+0x64/0x78) [ 56.790804] [<c003dff4>] (lock_acquire) from [<c035cbf4>] (_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x44/0x58) [ 56.798865] [<c035cbf4>] (_raw_spin_lock_bh) from [<c0232fdc>] (_rtw_alloc_network+0x14/0xc4) [ 56.807442] [<c0232fdc>] (_rtw_alloc_network) from [<c0235e68>] (rtw_update_scanned_network+0x98/0x250) [ 56.816881] [<c0235e68>] (rtw_update_scanned_network) from [<c0236118>] (rtw_survey_event_callback+0xf8/0x1c4) [ 56.826922] [<c0236118>] (rtw_survey_event_callback) from [<c023683c>] (mlme_evt_hdl+0x5c/0xec) [ 56.835658] [<c023683c>] (mlme_evt_hdl) from [<c022aef0>] (rtw_cmd_thread+0x110/0x348) [ 56.843623] [<c022aef0>] (rtw_cmd_thread) from [<c002c964>] (kthread+0xb8/0xd4) [ 56.850972] [<c002c964>] (kthread) from [<c0009680>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)

I get network list success.

This problem fixed in next linux versions?
Thank you and excuse me for my bad english.

--
Best regards,
Brilliantov Kirill Vladimirovich

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux