On 02/25/2015 12:59 PM, ap420073 . wrote:
2015-02-26 3:33 GMT+09:00 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 02/25/2015 11:58 AM, Taehee Yoo wrote:
rtl_op_stop get wowlan state but rtl92cu_get_hw_reg has not process.
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx>
Has this been tested? I am not aware that the RTL8192CU firmware could
handle WOWLAN.
Larry
---
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/hw.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/hw.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/hw.c
index fe4b699..f6ad959 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/hw.c
@@ -1589,6 +1589,12 @@ void rtl92cu_get_hw_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8
variable, u8 *val)
case HW_VAR_DATA_FILTER:
*((u16 *) (val)) = rtl_read_word(rtlpriv, REG_RXFLTMAP2);
break;
+ case HAL_DEF_WOWLAN:
+ if (ppsc->wo_wlan_mode)
+ *((bool *)(val)) = true;
+ else
+ *((bool *)(val)) = false;
+ break;
default:
RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_ERR, DBG_EMERG,
"switch case not processed\n");
As far as i know, rtl8192cu is not support WOWLAN.
in rtl8192cu, this code is no effect. so, It is care of unnecessary
debug message.
That is what I thought. In that case, the new code should be
case HAL_DEF_WOWLAN:
break;
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
