Reinette, > In the comments about bss_info_changed it is said that the callback has > to be atomic. I was looking at it and could only find that it is called > either from the workqueue or an ioctl. It thus seems that we may be able > to sleep in there. I likely missed the spot where it needs to be atomic > ... could you please direct me to it? I think you may be right, I can't find any spots either. I was likely mislead when writing that by the fact that much of the code in ieee80211_sta.c uses GFP_ATOMIC while it actually runs from a workqueue, which is actually confusing me still. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
