On 24 January 2015 at 17:24, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This should fix a very rare occurrence of the following deadlock: >> >> [<ffffffffa018265e>] ath10k_wmi_tx_beacons_nowait+0x1e/0x50 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa01829b6>] ath10k_wmi_op_ep_tx_credits+0x16/0x40 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa017d685>] ath10k_htc_send+0x285/0x3d0 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa0184b81>] ath10k_wmi_cmd_send_nowait+0x81/0x110 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa0184c61>] ath10k_wmi_tx_beacon_nowait.part.33+0x51/0x90 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa0184cd0>] ath10k_wmi_tx_beacons_iter+0x30/0x40 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffff81882246>] __iterate_active_interfaces+0xa6/0x100 >> [<ffffffffa0184ca0>] ? ath10k_wmi_tx_beacon_nowait.part.33+0x90/0x90 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffff818822ae>] ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic+0xe/0x10 >> [<ffffffffa0182676>] ath10k_wmi_tx_beacons_nowait+0x36/0x50 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa01829b6>] ath10k_wmi_op_ep_tx_credits+0x16/0x40 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa017d140>] ath10k_htc_rx+0x280/0x410 [ath10k_core] >> [<ffffffffa01bcbf0>] ? ath10k_ce_completed_recv_next+0x60/0x80 [ath10k_pci] >> [<ffffffffa01bc6ab>] ath10k_pci_ce_recv_data+0x11b/0x1d0 [ath10k_pci] >> [<ffffffffa01bcf44>] ath10k_ce_per_engine_service+0x64/0xc0 [ath10k_pci] >> [<ffffffffa01bcfc2>] ath10k_ce_per_engine_service_any+0x22/0x50 [ath10k_pci] >> [<ffffffffa01bc4d0>] ath10k_pci_tasklet+0x30/0x90 [ath10k_pci] >> [<ffffffff81055a55>] tasklet_action+0xc5/0x100 >> >> To prevent this make sure to release ar->data_lock >> while calling to ath10k_wmi_beacon_send_ref_nowait(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> > > This introduces a new warning from kbuild: > > tree: git://github.com/kvalo/ath ath-next-test > head: 59030a70b61c41268383d1406bb49fc559e0da4e > commit: 60845cf1bc104bbec7509eb4b6c9f09a1559bfdc [104/113] ath10k: fix beacon deadlock > > New smatch warnings: > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c:969 ath10k_wmi_tx_beacon_nowait() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'bcn' (see line 967) >From a practical standpoint there is no dereference because control buffer is inlined in sk_buff and it ends up just as an offset to the sk_buff. I guess smatch couldn't figure this out due to macros. When I run smatch (tip) locally it doesn't complain about this. Maybe I'm missing some parameters? I'll post a v2 later. Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html