On 26 January 2015 at 07:58, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This allows us to drop some #ifdef magic (mess). >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> V2: Return false in bcma_core_pci_is_in_hostmode >> Don't (accidentally) modify bcma_host_soc_register_driver > > It would be far more reliable if you resend the whole patchset instead > of resending invidiviual patches within the set. Otherwise the chances > are that I apply the wrong version. Oops. I always take care of removing old versions from patchwork and using --in-reply-to, I was hoping it's OK. How would you like whole patches to be re-send? Should I resend them independently? Or should every patch from the patchset include In-Reply-To pointing to its previous version? Is this just an advise for the future, or would you like me to resend this patchset too? -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
